![]() ![]() This speeds up the delivery, reduces server load, and improves the overall user experience. When the next visitor comes along, the caching engine serves the stored copy instead of recreating the page for the second time. Caching means creating and storing a copy of the static content generated when a user visits one of your pages. LiteSpeed and OpenLiteSpeed are notorious for their powerful caching engine. The result is a noticeable speed advantage, especially on busy websites. Like Nginx, LSWS and OLS are also based on an event-driven architecture, allowing them to process a large number of requests while keeping the hardware resource usage to a minimum. It handles multiple connections under a single process, meaning it’s not only faster but also more efficient than the Apache method. That’s why Nginx, Apache’s main competitor in terms of market share, uses an event-driven architecture. Nowadays, it’s far from the most efficient approach. This method for processing requests can trace its roots several decades back when traffic was much lower, and websites were less complex. LiteSpeed AdvantagesĪpache and Nginx represent the two main types of web servers.įirst, you have Apache, which is a process-driven web server, meaning it spawns a new process or thread for every new connection. The main competition comes from Apache and Nginx – the two top web server solutions, cumulatively powering just under 70% of all websites, according to W3Techs. The best way to highlight both the advantages and the drawbacks is to compare LiteSpeed’s servers to the other established names on the market. As is clear from the low adoption rates, however, site owners also find a few things they’re not particularly sure about. Apache and NginxĪ few factors make LSWS and OLS more appealing than the competition. And as with any open-source product, you have to rely on the community for support if you have any issues setting up and running OpenLiteSpeed. Transitioning from an existing Apache setup to OLS is also more difficult than it is when you’re moving to LiteSpeed’s Enterprise edition. For example, some of the anti-DDoS tools have been omitted, and the caching engine has been stripped from its most advanced mechanisms. You can install it on any server and power as many websites as you want without paying a dime.Ī few of LSWS’ features are missing in OLS. ![]() Unlike LSWS, however, OpenLiteSpeed is free to download, use, and redistribute. ![]() It uses the same architecture as LiteSpeed, and it’s developed by the same people. OpenLiteSpeed (OLS) is the open-source edition of LiteSpeed Web Server. In a few moments, we’ll try to figure out why this is the case, and we’ll also see why you may want to consider giving LSWS a go.įirst, though, a few words about OpenLiteSpeed. Its share has grown over the last few years, but site owners clearly prefer to stick with the traditional names on the market. According to W3Techs, it’s used by just under 12% of the world’s websites. If the web server stops responding for some reason, the entire website will become inaccessible.Īlthough it’s been around for nearly two decades, LiteSpeed has yet to catch up with the competition. Your site’s performance depends on how quickly your web server processes the visitors’ requests. It’s one of the most critical components of any hosting setup. Not to be confused with the virtual or physical machine hosting your website, it’s the software responsible for receiving HTTP requests from clients and responding to them with the appropriate resources (files and web pages or error messages). Before we go on, we should probably make sure everyone knows what a web server is. LiteSpeed Web Server (also known as LSWS or LiteSpeed Enterprise) is a proprietary web server launched in 2003. Let’s see what performance benefits you can reap from such a change. One of the things you can do is optimize your web hosting setup, and one of the things you can change about it is to swap your current web server for LiteSpeed Web Server or its open-source edition, OpenLiteSpeed. ![]() Speaking of Google results, search engines aren’t particularly fond of poor-performing websites, either, so if you don’t reduce your site’s loading times, you may struggle to achieve the rankings you’re after. Instead of waiting for a page that takes ages to load, they usually prefer to go to the next Google result. Website owners are on an endless quest for better performance, which shouldn’t surprise anyone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |